<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reader feedback Archives - Claxon Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="https://claxon-communication.com/tag/reader-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://claxon-communication.com/tag/reader-feedback/</link>
	<description>Claxon creates powerful messaging for purpose-driven clients.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Is awesome awesome?</title>
		<link>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/02/16/is-awesome-awesome/</link>
					<comments>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/02/16/is-awesome-awesome/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erica Barnhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants & Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claxonette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader feedback]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://claxon-communication.com/?p=5489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s talk about the word &#8216;awesome&#8217;, shall we? I got a note from a Claxonette reader this week who took umbrage with my use of the word &#8216;awesome&#8217;. She said: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://claxon-communication.com/2014/02/16/is-awesome-awesome/">Is awesome awesome?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://claxon-communication.com">Claxon Communication</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft  wp-image-6878" src="https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-300x217.jpg" alt="Awesome stamp" width="270" height="195" srcset="https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-300x217.jpg 300w, https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-1024x742.jpg 1024w, https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-768x556.jpg 768w, https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-1536x1113.jpg 1536w, https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-2048x1484.jpg 2048w, https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/awesome-1568x1136.jpg 1568w" sizes="(max-width: 270px) 100vw, 270px" /></a>Let&#8217;s talk about the word &#8216;awesome&#8217;, shall we?</p>
<p>I got a note from a <a href="http://p0.vresp.com/GsxL0e" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Claxonette </a>reader this week who took umbrage with my use of the word &#8216;awesome&#8217;. She said:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><em>A fine writer and storyteller would NOT use a word as insipid and tiresomely worn out as “awesome.” </em></p>
<p>Okay, well, don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m a &#8220;fine writer and storyteller&#8221;, but I am gal who loves the word awesome. And here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>Awesome means <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/awesome" target="_blank" rel="noopener">causing feelings of wonder and awe</a>. Given the world we live in, couldn&#8217;t we all use a little more wonder and awe? I believe so. Thus, I use the word awesome. A lot.</p>
<p>I thought long and hard about whether I&#8217;d include awesome in my <a style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5em;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ClaxonMarketing/personal-lexicon-v1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Personal Lexicon</a><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5em;">. People tend to love it or hate it. (</span>Maybe it should be listed under the &#8216;Use with Caution&#8217; category of the 2014 List of <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/ClaxonMarketing/words-thatwowfinal-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Words that Wow</a> as a way of acknowledging that it has its foibles?)</p>
<p>People&#8217;s reactions to awesome are, in fact, so strong, that when I teach people how to create their <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/ClaxonMarketing/personal-lexicon-v1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Personal Lexicon</a>, I use awesome as an example of a word that will either define their lexicon or not. I had a student who said: &#8220;I&#8217;d rather be caught dead than use that word!&#8221; at the same time as another exclaimed, &#8220;I use awesome all the time!&#8221;</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a lot of neutral ground with awesome. And that&#8217;s okay. When it comes to using language to increase your impact, you don&#8217;t want neutral. You want to use words to differentiate yourself, your cause, your organization.</p>
<p>Awesome isn&#8217;t for everyone. And I respect that. But I, for one, think awesome is awesome.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://claxon-communication.com/2014/02/16/is-awesome-awesome/">Is awesome awesome?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://claxon-communication.com">Claxon Communication</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/02/16/is-awesome-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5489</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
