<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>#SmallWordsMatter Archives - Claxon Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="https://claxon-communication.com/tag/smallwordsmatter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://claxon-communication.com/tag/smallwordsmatter/</link>
	<description>Claxon creates powerful messaging for purpose-driven clients.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Why smart fundraisers pay attention to pronouns</title>
		<link>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/09/09/why-smart-fundraisers-pay-attention-to-pronouns/</link>
					<comments>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/09/09/why-smart-fundraisers-pay-attention-to-pronouns/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erica Barnhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SmallWordsMatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donor communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[function words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennebaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pronouns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://claxon-communication.com/?p=6357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would love to get together for coffee.&#8221; &#8220;Would love to get together for coffee.&#8221; The difference between these two sentences may seem subtle, but it&#8217;s actually staggering:. The difference, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://claxon-communication.com/2014/09/09/why-smart-fundraisers-pay-attention-to-pronouns/">Why smart fundraisers pay attention to pronouns</a> appeared first on <a href="https://claxon-communication.com">Claxon Communication</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignleft wp-image-6358 size-thumbnail" src="https://claxon-communication.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/donate-150x150.jpg" alt="nonprofits, fundraising, donations, donors, donor communications" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p><em>&#8220;I would love to get together for coffee.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Would love to get together for coffee.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The difference between these two sentences may seem subtle, but it&#8217;s actually staggering:.</p>
<p>The difference, obviously, is that the second sentence drops the &#8220;I&#8221;. Why is this so earth-shattering? And why should you care? Because pronouns reflect power dynamics. Pronouns could reveal just how many cups of coffee you may need to have before they cut you a check.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;re in the power position, you use pronouns less often. You&#8217;ll drop them altogether. You won&#8217;t notice you&#8217;re doing this. We all do it subconsciously.</p>
<p>Using the example above, the second response would indicate that the donor is still mulling over whether your organization will be on their Philanthropic Hit Parade. They&#8217;re holding their cards close to their chest, one eyebrow raised. Their pronoun-free response is their subtle way of saying, &#8220;Still on the fence, dear fundraiser. Make your case and I&#8217;ll ponder.&#8221;</p>
<p>We can figure all of this out simply by looking at a measly pronoun? Yep, that&#8217;s right. Pronouns. I, we, he, she, us, them. These itsy, bitsy words matter. A lot.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8221; is the single most frequently used word in spoken and written texts. Indeed, thanks to<a href="http://www.secretlifeofpronouns.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Professor James W. Pennebaker and his research team</a>, we know that &#8220;I&#8221; accounts for 3.64% of all words used. That alone is interesting as it reflects what we care about most&#8211;ourselves. To be clear, being focused on yourself doesn&#8217;t make you a self-centered jerk. It means you&#8217;re human and, therefore, hard-wired to focus on survival. Just cuz a tiger is no longer chasing you across a tundra doesn&#8217;t mean your brain isn&#8217;t fighting to survive. It just looks a little different these days.</p>
<p>Focusing on ourselves is inevitable. And our language reveals this.</p>
<p>Pronouns and the larger category that they fall under called &#8220;function words&#8221;, are your linguistic BFFs. Paying attention to them can pay off in a big way. The more you use <a href="https://claxon-communication.com/2014/03/21/your-yours-use-often-wordsthatwow/">&#8220;you&#8221; and &#8220;your&#8221;</a>, and the less you use &#8220;I&#8221; and &#8220;We&#8221;, the more you speak directly to what the donor (as a human being) cares about most&#8211;him or herself.</p>
<p><em><strong>If your goal is to engage donors, mind your p&#8217;s and q&#8217;s and absolutely, positively pay attention to your pronouns. </strong></em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://claxon-communication.com/2014/09/09/why-smart-fundraisers-pay-attention-to-pronouns/">Why smart fundraisers pay attention to pronouns</a> appeared first on <a href="https://claxon-communication.com">Claxon Communication</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://claxon-communication.com/2014/09/09/why-smart-fundraisers-pay-attention-to-pronouns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6357</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
